My name is Bridget, and I’m living in Dublin Ireland and working full time as Senior Manager in financial services. I have a Master’s degree.

In May 2010 I went to London to meet Bob Doman. I had seen the amazing difference that Bob and Sara Erling had made working with my niece. I was curious to know if I, an average adult, could benefit from doing a similar NACD program.

I was aware that I wasn’t as efficient as I could be. I could see that some of my colleagues were more organised, could process information faster, and were more logical in their approach.

What Happened?

In May Bob carried out the assessment, which involved a number of visual and auditory tests. A couple of days later, he gave me a program tailored to my needs.

Since then I’ve invested around an hour a day, 5 days a week. In that time my baseline processing scores have increased significantly.

More importantly, I’ve experienced significant behavioural changes. I’m more effective and confident in work. I have better quality leisure time. My analytical and problem-solving skills have increased. I’m also a much better reader.

My husband has observed changes too, and I have shared these with you below. But first I’m going to tell you a little more about what’s happened to me.

More Effective & Confident At Work

We tend to have a lot of conference calls in work. I was brilliant at tuning out and multi-tasking whilst on the call. While listening, I’d respond to e-mail and draw up ‘to do’ lists, which meant I’m wasn’t engaging in the meeting. So I asked Bob to help me with my listening skills.

I can now really focus at meetings. I contribute to the discussion, ask relevant questions, and at the end of the meeting, I understand the implications for our department. I can also understand other peoples’ perspectives better.

Bob also helped me with my focus and attention skills. As a result, my concentration improved dramatically. I now start and finish each task before moving to the next one. I don’t allow myself to get distracted.

I believe both of these changes have made me more productive and effective at work, which has reduced my stress levels. I also have more confidence in my abilities.

Better Quality Leisure Time

You may know that Ireland is in deep recession and the Government has announced details of its 4-year austerity plan.

In June, in anticipation of the recession, we took a key decision to sell our house. It sold quickly, which meant we signed a lease on a rental property in July.

This provided the perfect opportunity to re-organise our life. We moved closer to the town, which meant that I can walk to and from work. When we go to a restaurant or to meet our friends at the tennis club or in local restaurant, we can walk home.

We made other changes, such as hiring a cleaner on Friday afternoons and ordering the shopping online on Thursday evenings. We also re-organised our furniture and put a lot of things we didn’t need into storage. So now everything in the new house is in place and consequently, the house runs more efficiently.

This has really increased the quality of our leisure time on weekends. This is a big change for me because previously I spent most of my time on the weekends doing cleaning, shopping, and running around doing errands. I never got a break, whereas, now we have fabulous weekends, as everything is taken care of during the week.

Our decision to sell our home has also really paid off, as a similar house to ours is now on the market for an asking price which is 20% less than what we sold for – and its only 4 months since we sold.

I attribute my ability to make these life decisions and changes to my increased organization and improved thinking skills.

More Analytical Thinking

The recession also got me thinking about my own finances and the future. I wanted to put some financial plans in place that would give us more options for later in life.

I started two Company share save schemes, and I also started paying additional voluntary contributions into my pension.

I also made some short-term changes which has resulted in reducing our outgoings on a monthly basis – e.g., I reduced my husband’s car insurance by adding him to my policy. We reduced the home insurance, as we no longer needed buildings covered. For the first time ever, I completed a medical tax return and claimed my Club Subscriptions in work, as my files were more organised and I had the relevant receipts.

Now I feel much more in control of my finances and have got a lot of pleasure out of putting the savings and pension plans in place.

Better Problem-Solving Skills

As I’m working full time and have a busy life, I didn’t really have time to fit in the NACD program. I used to try and do it when I came home from work about 8 o’clock in the evening. This didn’t work because I was too tired.

So I agreed with my boss that I would start at 9.30am. This enabled me to do it first thing in the morning when my concentration was good. This is now working well, and I can see the difference in the Simply Smarter scores.

I will admit that I have good and bad days like everybody else. However I always like it when Bob reminds me that it is not about the score, it is about the behaviours.

One of the behaviours I use frequently now is to look at what’s working well and what’s not working well, both in terms of my life at home and at work. I’m not afraid to try out different solutions to see if I can get a better result.

A Better Reader

When I first went to visit Bob, I wasn’t a good reader. He was taken aback at the time, as he wondered where I got my information. He really encouraged me to read a lot more and to listen to audio books. I now always have an audio book on my iPod, which I listen to walking to and from work every day. I also love reading the newspaper on a daily basis.

As a result of this, I’ve noticed that I’m much better reader at work too. I get a grasp of the information much faster. I have to say that this has been one my favourite changes about the program.

A Word From My Husband

My husband now finds our house more efficient. He can find everything he needs because it is in its place.

He’s noticed that I’m a better cook. He sees less wastage, more variety and use of fresh produce. He likes all the different cooking techniques like flambé, bourguignon, soup made with fresh stock, etc.

He also finds the weekends more enjoyable because we’re doing more simple things like going for a walk in the park and having Sunday lunch out with the family. His mantra, in these recessionary times, is ‘less is more.’

He thinks we’re working even better together to come up with the optimum solution for us.

Finally, he finds our house to be even more harmonious. He attributes this to the fact that I’m much happier, and that makes him happier too.

Conclusion

Last May I set out to find out if NACD could make me smarter like my niece. I decided to give it 6 months to see if it worked.

In return for my investment of an hour a day, I feel that I have genuinely gained enormously from the program. I feel at the top of my game now. I’m much more organised and in control. I feel more effective and happier and have more time to relax and enjoy the weekends.

I’ve decided now to keep going for a further 6 months with NACD because I’m getting so much out of it and I feel that I can do even better.

If you have any queries about my experience, please email me at bridgetsheehan@ymail.com. I would encourage you to talk to Bob or Sara to find out more about how this program can enhance your life too.

A Note from NACD

The graphs below illustrate Bridget’s improvement in her sequential processing skills over a six-month period. Bridget’s scores are represented by a star.

The graphs have been designed for and are based on data we have collected from the NACD Foundation’s Simply Smarter Project. The black line between the red and yellow zones on the graph represents the average processing level of each corresponding age group. The colors on the graph represent how well the individual is doing relative to others of their age.

The Red Zone is a danger zone! Individuals scoring in the red zone have processing skills below 50% of those in their age range. These individuals are not processing as well as they should be or need to be to realize their potential. It would be expected that those in this range are struggling more than necessary in many, if not most, aspects of their lives.

The Yellow Zone is an intermediate zone. Those that test in this area are functioning higher than 50% of those in their age group, but they are possibly still struggling and have not yet achieved levels of processing that are permitting them to fully realize their potential.

The Green Zone is the goal. The Green Zone represents those who are processing well and the goal most people should try to achieve. In this group we would typically find those with superior skills and function. Those scoring in the Green Zones should have short-term memory, working-memory, and executive mental functions that would permit them to excel.

In June for Bridget’s auditory forward digit span, which represents auditory short-term memory, and her reverse auditory digit span, which represents auditory working memory, she tested at a 6, below the average for her age group and in the Red Zone. In six months she increased her processing in both of these critical functions to 10s, putting her into the superior range of the Green Zone!

In visual forward digit spans, representing visual short term memory, she initially scored a 7, which put her right at the average point for her age group and on the line between the Red and Yellow Zone. Her reverse visual digit span, representing her visual working memory, initially placed her at an 8, in the Yellow Zone. Six months later she scored an incredible Green Zone 12!

Her change in function is representative of the work she has done with the Simply Smarter System. Sequential processing is a key component to changing focus, attention, communication, learning, conceptualization, visualization, comprehension, organization, complexity of thought, motivation, and overall well being. Simply Smarter is an essential tool for adults and children to help increase their overall function and productivity.

Keys to Bridget’s success were her motivation, the intensity with which completed her activities, and her consistency.

Congratulations, Bridget! Brilliant!

Reprinted by permission of The NACD Foundation, Volume 23 No. 5, 2010 ©NACD

The post NACD Makes Adults Smarter Too! appeared first on NACD International | The National Association for Child Development.

The post NACD KIDS: From Smart to Brilliant appeared first on NACD International | The National Association for Child Development.

The term “neurological organization” means that the brain can take in and store information in an orderly and “organized” fashion. A child lacking in complete neurological organization is to some degree neurologically dysorganized. To a large extent, this is an environmental or inherited problem as opposed to the organic dysorganization found in a child suffering from a brain injury.

The first step in detecting neurological dysorganization is to evaluate the child against the developmental profile and to have him tested to rule out the possibility of an organic problem.

NACD’s evaluation of these children begins by determining the organization at the brain level of the pons. This is ascertained while viewing the child’s ability to crawl on his stomach. The child should be able to crawl on his stomach in what is termed a “cross pattern” without receiving specific instruction. Cross-pattern crawling is forward movement where the child extends his right arm and pulls up his left leg, pushing and pulling with the right arm and left leg. He then alternates his movement so that he is pushing and pulling with the left arm and right leg. If the child crawls in what is called a homolateral pattern (which is pushing and pulling with the right arm and right leg, and then the left arm and left leg) he is exhibiting a degree of dysorganization at that level. If the child crawls without a pattern or in a manner where he is extending both arms forward and pulling both legs up, he is also reflecting dysorganization in the pons area of the brain.

Advancing to the mid-brain, organization or dysorganization can be assessed by examining the child’s ability to creep on his hands and knees. Remember, you crawl before you creep. Crawling is on the stomach, and creeping is on the hands and knees. The child should also creep in a cross pattern. Properly, the child’s hands should be extended flat on the floor with fingers pointing forward. Ideally, the child should be looking forward at the extended hand. Again, if the child creeps in a homologous (bunny hop) or a homolateral pattern (right arm and right leg) he is exhibiting a degree of dysorganization. In assessing your child’s ability to creep, it is necessary that you have him creep at various speeds, with varied amounts of starting and stopping. A child properly organized at this level should never go into the homolateral pattern or homologous pattern.

Progressing up into the lower cortex area of the brain, you may evaluate organization by viewing the child’s ability to walk. Instruct the child to walk across the room while he points at his feet, and assess whether he is walking in a homolateral pattern or a cross pattern. You may wish to demonstrate to the child what you intend him to do, then have him mimic your actions. Have the child follow your instructions while starting and stopping his movement several times. Any hesitation he displays about which hand to point is an indication of dysorganization. He should be pointing opposite hand to opposite foot, and should not walk in a homolateral pattern. There are many children who lack this cross-pattern function, and they reflect coordination problems to a certain extent. Coordinated gross motor action culminates in a cross pattern whether it’s bowling, doing a basketball lay-up, or throwing a baseball pitch. A child who lacks complete organization will display a loss of coordination to some degree. Interestingly, there is the rare child who is neurologically dysorganized but has good coordination. Such children generally have other inefficiencies, particularly mixed dominance.

Neurological organization culminates at the top cortical level of the brain. This organization is the establishment of cortical-hemispheric dominance. This is the establishment of a dominant hemisphere, or side. A completely organized child should be right-handed, right-footed, right-eared, and right-eyed, or left-handed, left-footed, and so on.

To assess your child’s dominance, begin by evaluating the function of his hands. You can find out if he has a dominant hand, as this will be the hand he writes with, throws a ball with, etc. These functions should all be done with the same hand. If a child writes with one hand and throws a ball with the opposite hand, he obviously is displaying mixed dominance. Assessment of foot dominance is essentially done by using the same method, observing which foot the child kicks with, hops with, etc.

To assess auditory dominance, have the child put his ear next to the door and attempt to listen to conversation that is emanating from the other side. Speak very softly so that the child leans toward you. The child will turn his head to either the right or left so that the dominant ear is closest to the source of the sound.

Assessment of visual dominance is accomplished at what is called near point and far point, using vision as close as three feet and at a further distance. To assess the child at a distance, have him point his finger toward your finger while you extend your arm and point your finger toward the child. If you sight along your finger to his finger, you can find out which eye he is using. You may wish to have him alternate his extended arm from right to left to double check your findings. Also have the child look into a telescope or kaleidoscope, as he will invariably use the dominant eye.

At near point place a one-eighth inch dot on a piece of paper and put another paper with a one-eighth inch hole in the center on top. Line up the hole with the dot so that the child can see the dot by looking through the hole on the top piece of paper. Have the child grasp the paper with the hole in both hands and slowly move the paper up to his eye, watching the dot the entire time. Again, watch which eye the child brings the paper to, as it will invariably be the dominant eye.

A completely organized child will have a dominant hand, foot, ear, and eye, which will be all on the same side. If the child lacks complete dominance in any area or does not exhibit dominance on the same side, it’s a reflection of a degree of neurological dysorganization.

If the child lacks a controlling hemisphere of the brain organization is lacking because the influx of information to the brain is not occurring correctly. For instance, a child may take visual information through his right eye and store it in his left hemisphere. When a child neglects to take in information from one side and place it in one hemisphere he is not establishing firm pathways into the brain. The child cannot efficiently process that information. You might view the dysorganization as a room filled with filing cabinets. If he is properly organized all of the files are in alphabetical order and he can place a piece of information in and extract it efficiently. A dysorganized child’s files are not alphabetized, and he may absorb the information but when he attempts to retrieve it he may be unable to do so. These children are classically the ones who study for a test one night, only to fail when they go in to take it. They took in the information but lost it when they attempted to retrieve it. When you place these children under any type of stress, the system immediately begins falling apart, and their function diminishes. Often these children neglect to remember a homework assignment from the previous night, yet they can remember what color dress mother wore on Christmas two years previously. These individuals are not lacking innate intelligence. They just cannot properly take in information, assimilate it, process it, and bring it back out again.

The NACD Foundation offers a six-hour parent training seminar on cassette that explains in detail how children develop neurological organization and how they learn. The Foundation also provides neurological evaluations for children and programs to improve their neurological organization. For more information on the tapes and the evaluations, parents may call.

Reprinted from the Journal of The NACD Foundation (formerly The National Academy for Child Development)

Reprinted by permission of The NACD Foundation, Volume 8 No. 1, 1987 ©NACD

The post Learning Disabilities and Organization appeared first on NACD International | The National Association for Child Development.

Special Education

Twenty-five years ago, special education was in its infancy. It was virtually impossible for the parents of children with severe problems to obtain any services from their school systems. With the recent development of special education and the passing of legislation providing for children with special needs, funds are now available through state and federal governments to supplement the education of these children. An effort is being made to evaluate and place more and more children, and as a result, the numbers of “special” programs have increased, and many children are being inappropriately labeled and placed in special classes.

Special Education Placement and Classification

Children are being labeled as learning disabled, hyperactive, neurologically impaired, etc., and are being assigned special class placement, while proper programs are still not available for children with severe problems. Each year, new classifications arise for those individuals who do not “fit” into the regular, “normal” classroom. In some areas, as many as 40 percent of the school population is currently pigeon-holed to fit into one of these categories. Fortunately for most of us, we were attending school during a period when these classifications did not exist. If they had, a large percentage of us would have been placed in special classrooms, attached with special labels.

Stigmas of Labelization

It is important to note that the classifications are administrative ones and they are not a diagnosis, for there is no such disease as hyperkinesis, hyperactivity, learning disabled, etc. These are merely symptoms of a problem, and they are not the problem itself. Children who are placed in these special-education categories become stigmatized by the label because they are segregated and thrust into an abnormal environment that makes it virtually impossible for them to learn normal, appropriate behaviors. Obviously, a child is incapable of learning normal behavior in an abnormal environment. Accordingly, these children, instead of having a great opportunity to succeed, have even less of a chance.

The Use of Drugs

Sadly, many of these labeled children are also placed on drugs in an effort to quiet and calm them down. Estimates of the number of “learning disabled” or “hyperactive” children on drugs go as high as 3 million children in this country today. It is amazing that the education-medical establishment can rationalize the placement of such a large group of children on amphetamines and other drugs during a period when we hear through various media of a public outcry denouncing the usage of drugs in our society by children.

Identification of Problems

The youth of today often exhibit difficulties in various facets of education such as reading, mathematics, etc. Not long ago, I lectured to a group of parents in a community where the most popular labels attached to children were neurologically impaired and communicationally handicapped. The parents pressed me to identify the terms I would use to label such children. My response was, “I call these children easy.” When one of these children would walk into my office, I usually would think, “Here comes one that is easy” or “there’s an easy one.” Why? Because the problems of these children are easy to identify and generally easy to remediate, as the children are often found to be what is termed neurologically dysorganized.

Neurological Dysorganization

A child who is found to be lacking in complete neurological organization is, to some degree, neurologically dysorganized. To a large extent, this is an environmental problem or an inherited problem, as opposed to organic dysorganization such as would be found in a child who is suffering from a brain injury. The first step in detecting neurological dysorganization is to evaluate the child against the developmental profile and to have him tested to rule out the possibility of an organic problem.

Evaluation of Dysorganization

NACD’s evaluation of these children begins by determining the organization at the brain level of the pons. This is ascertained while viewing the child’s ability to crawl on his stomach. The child should be able to crawl on his stomach in what is termed a “cross pattern” without receiving specific instruction. Cross-pattern crawling is forward movement where the child extends his right arm and pulls up his left leg, pushing and pulling with the right arm and left leg. He then alternates his movement so that he is pushing and pulling with the left arm and right leg. If the child crawls in what is called a homolateral pattern (which is pushing and pulling with the right arm and right leg, and then the left arm and left leg) he is exhibiting a degree of dysorganization at that level. If the child crawls without a pattern or in a manner where he is extending both arms forward and pulling both legs up, he is also reflecting dysorganization in the pons area of the brain.

Mid-brain Evaluation

Advancing to the mid-brain, organization or dysorganization can be assessed by examining the child’s ability to creep on his hands and knees. Remember, you crawl before you creep. Crawling is on the stomach, and creeping is on the hands and knees. The child should also creep in a cross pattern. Properly, the child’s hands should be extended flat on the floor with fingers pointing forward. Ideally, the child should be looking forward at the extended hand. Again, if the child creeps in a homologous (bunny hop) or a homolateral pattern (right arm and right leg) he is exhibiting a degree of dysorganization. In assessing your child’s ability to creep, it is necessary that you have him creep at various speeds, with varied amounts of starting and stopping. A child properly organized at this level should never go into the homolateral pattern or homologous pattern.

The Cortex

Progressing up into the lower cortex area of the brain, you may evaluate organization by viewing the child’s ability to walk. Instruct the child to walk across the room while he points at his feet, and assess whether he is walking in a homolateral pattern or a cross pattern. You may wish to demonstrate to the child what you intend him to do, then have him mimic your actions. Have the child follow your instructions while starting and stopping his movement several times. Any hesitation he displays about which hand to point is an indication of dysorganization. He should be pointing opposite hand to opposite foot, and should not walk in a homolateral pattern. There are many children who lack this cross-pattern function, and they reflect coordination problems to a certain extent. Coordinated gross motor action culminates in a cross pattern whether it’s bowling, doing a basketball lay-up, or throwing a baseball pitch. A child who lacks complete organization will display a loss of coordination to some degree. Interestingly, there is the rare child who is neurologically dysorganized but has good coordination. Such children generally have other inefficiencies, particularly mixed dominance.

Cortical Hemispheric Dominance

Neurological organization culminates at the top cortical level of the brain. This organization is the establishment of cortical-hemispheric dominance. This is the establishment of a dominant hemisphere, or side. A completely organized child should be right-handed, right-footed, right-eared, and right-eyed, or left-handed, left-footed, and so on.

Assessment of Dominance

To assess your child’s dominance, begin by evaluating the function of his hands. You can find out if he has a dominant hand, as this will be the hand he writes with, throws a ball with, etc. These functions should all be done with the same hand. If a child writes with one hand and throws a ball with the opposite hand, he obviously is displaying mixed dominance. Assessment of foot dominance is essentially done by using the same method, observing which foot the child kicks with, hops with, etc.

To assess auditory dominance, have the child put his ear next to the door and attempt to listen to conversation that is emanating from the other side. Speak very softly so that the child leans toward you. The child will turn his head to either the right or left so that the dominant ear is closest to the source of the sound.

Assessment of visual dominance is accomplished at what is called near point and far point, using vision as close as three feet and at a further distance. To assess the child at a distance, have him point his finger toward your finger while you extend your arm and point your finger toward the child. If you sight along your finger to his finger, you can find out which eye he is using. You may wish to have him alternate his extended arm from right to left to double check your findings. Also have the child look into a telescope or kaleidoscope, as he will invariably use the dominant eye.

At near point place a one-eighth inch dot on a piece of paper and put another paper with a one-eighth inch hole in the center on top. Line up the hole with the dot so that the child can see the dot by looking through the hole on the top piece of paper. Have the child grasp the paper with the hole in both hands and slowly move the paper up to his eye, watching the dot the entire time. Again, watch which eye the child brings the paper to, as it will invariably be the dominant eye.

A completely organized child will have a dominant hand, foot, ear, and eye, which will be all on the same side. If the child lacks complete dominance in any area or does not exhibit dominance on the same side, it’s a reflection of a degree of neurological dysorganization.

How Dysorganization Affects Function

If the child lacks a controlling hemisphere of the brain organization is lacking because the influx of information to the brain is not occurring correctly. For instance, a child may take visual information through his right eye and store it in his left hemisphere. When a child neglects to take in information from one side and place it in one hemisphere he is not establishing firm pathways into the brain. The child cannot efficiently process that information. You might view the dysorganization as a room filled with filing cabinets. If he is properly organized all of the files are in alphabetical order and he can place a piece of information in and extract it efficiently. A dysorganized child’s files are not alphabetized, and he may absorb the information but when he attempts to retrieve it he may be unable to do so. These children are classically the ones who study for a test one night, only to fail when they go in to take it. They took in the information but lost it when they attempted to retrieve it. When you place these children under any type of stress, the system immediately begins falling apart, and their function diminishes. Often these children neglect to remember a homework assignment from the previous night, yet they can remember what color dress mother wore on Christmas two years previously. These individuals are not lacking innate intelligence. They just cannot properly take in information, assimilate it, process it, and bring it back out again.

Categorization and Classification

Categories and classifications depend to a large extent on the particular school system or district that the child is placed in. In one school district the child may be labeled as learning disabled, while in another he may be categorized as hyperactive. This is the same child with the same problem, but for the most part there are some differences in the symptoms of the children that are placed in these various categories.

The Hyperactive Child

A child who is severely hyperactive is possibly a child with an organic problem, such as a slight brain injury or metabolic problem. Many of these children may be helped through dietary restrictions or medical intervention. A large percentage of the children labeled as hyperactive are those who the teacher feels move around too much, are easily distracted, and/or exhibit a short attention span. There are many bright children who display these same characteristics. It is amazing that often a child who has been thus labeled can sit in front of a television set for an hour straight without losing interest.

Abnormal Learning Environments

Some children are placed in a learning environment that is inappropriate for them. The pace is too slow, the material covered is below their intellectual level, etc. Such a child needs to be challenged and stimulated, and he is not receiving this in his present learning environment. Young children are much brighter and quicker than we often assume, and we may assess a learning environment as appropriate for them when in reality the pace is too slow. As an example, I reflect back to when my son was in kindergarten. I received a call from the school saying my son possibly had a problem in that he seemed slightly hyperactive and had a short attention span. This characterized itself during story time. I went in to observe as the teacher arranged the class in a semi-circle and began reading a story. Sure enough, during the reading my son got up and went to the rear of the classroom where the books were stored and picked one out and began reading. After the teacher finished her reading, she came over to me and said, “Look! See what I mean? He has a short attention span and is unable to sit quietly while I read the story.” I told her that I would have been disappointed if he had remained seated, because he had read that book over a year ago.He was not hyperactive and he did not have a short attention span. He was merely bored. The teacher was reading material that he was already familiar with, and it was below his present intellectual level. It follows that a large percentage of the children diagnosed as hyperactive or hyperkinetic are in reality children who are bright but are bored at their school’s slow pace.

Learning Disabled Child

The child with this label usually is a child who is a classic example of neurological dysorganization. However, some children who are diagnosed as learning disabled have no problem at all, other than being situated in a learning environment that incorporates an inappropriate program. For instance, when you place a child who is a visual learner in a classroom atmosphere with an auditory approach to reading such as phonics, the child will often fail, not because he is incapable of learning to read but because he is a visual learner and has been placed in an auditory program. On numerous occasions, parents have brought their children into our offices claiming that they were failing first or second grade. Often it was the type of learning environment that actually played the key role in the problem. Often it was discovered that the children not only could read, but actually were reading above their grade level. These were children who for the most part had been instructed in kindergarten or nursery school to read by sight and were being tested on their grasp of phonics rather than their individual ability to read.

A child who is heavily visual or auditory does need some remediation in terms of developing the other modality. Such a child can be situated in a home program to strengthen his ability to assimilate and process visual or auditory information, depending upon which function was found lacking.

The Effects of Dysorganization

One of the effects of dysorganization and lack of a dominant hemisphere is often a problem with language-related activities, such as verbal language and reading. Language is a function of the dominant hemisphere, and if the child is dysorganized, he often has a handicap in terms of his language function. Interestingly, children who lack cortical-hemispheric dominance often have good musical abilities. Music is a function of the sub-dominant hemisphere. To clarify this, reflect on someone who has experienced a stroke. If the stroke occurred in the dominant hemisphere of the brain, the person quite possibly could have lost the ability to speak. If the same individual who could not speak were asked to sing, he quite possibly could do so, since music is not in the dominant hemisphere that was affected by the stroke.

The average child does not generally establish dominance until the end of first grade, although a child’s development can be accelerated to the point where dominance may be realized at the age of 2 or 3 years. However, placing children in a musical environment prior to establishment of dominance acts to reinforce the sub-dominant hemisphere, thus delaying the establishment of dominance. In many cases, without specific remediation we are making that child neurologically dysorganized in such a fashion that he may never become properly organized. Once the child exceeds the age of 6, he has become fixed in his method of accomplishing acts in a particular mode, such as writing with the left hand, kicking with the right food, etc. He will not naturally alter organization to become properly dominant. Specific remediation must take place if we are to correct the organization dysfunction.

The child who is labeled as having a communication handicap is one who lacks dominance, since language functions in the dominant hemisphere. This is the same type of problem experienced by individuals who stutter. We are able to listen to the stuttering child jump from hemisphere to hemisphere in an attempt to communicate.

Behavioral Problems

Children identified as having a behavior problem are generally easy to remediate, with appropriate treatment and management. The problem, however, can be a severe handicap for the child. The dysorganized but otherwise bright child, who is presently not functioning at the same level as his peers, questions his own intelligence and dwells upon what is wrong and why he is different. A large portion of these children eventually (at approximately the third grade level) develop behavior problems. These behavioral problems can originate as a self-defense mechanism, one that the child formulates in an effort to protect his battered ego. If a child tries and fails, he generally is left with only one recourse, which is to internalize the belief that he is of below normal intelligence. Therefore, it is safer in the terms of his ego protection to not try at all or to act out. He then can blame his failure on the fact that he did not try, which is much easier for him to live with.

Children labeled as behavior problems will develop a poor self-image, particularly if they are placed in a special class. Every child attending school knows who is placed in a special classroom, and the child becomes an object of taunting and ridicule by his peers, which only serves to strengthen his poor self- image. He is segregated at the school and in the neighborhood, which correspondingly alters the child’s behavior to produce feelings of despondency that force the child to withdraw and be come introverted and often aggressive. These children seem to be always getting into fights, and very often it is they who initiate the quarrel.

Sexual Disparity

The problems of hyperactivity, learning disability, etc., are more commonly attributed to boys than they are to girls. The primary cause of this disparity between the sexes is a matter of motivation and getting a proper start in life. Before children enter a classroom environment, little girls are in the house playing school while their male counterparts are outside rough-housing and playing in the dirt.

A friend called one day in hysterics, stating that her son in kindergarten received a report from his teacher stating that he had flunked paper-cutting. The mother was at a loss to explain why her son had failed, and she desired to know what this failure entailed. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the child. He was very active and bright. He just had not received prior experience in cutting, which is a problem you would rarely find in a girl as they are continually cutting out paper dolls and making dresses for them, etc. Girls have the advantage of starting school on the right foot, since they play school at an early age and are interested in reading quietly in their mothers’ laps and listening to stories, thereby internalizing various words and phrases spoken. As a result of this prior knowledge, they generally succeed in the early stages of school. That is not to say that females do not exist who fall into the various categories of learning disabled and hyperkinetic. However, the ratio within these categories is three boys to every one girl.

Difficulties in the Classroom

One of the great tragedies of this era is that many children are being classified and labeled, restricted in their opportunities and being denied the opportunities of reaching their potentials. A child who has been placed in a special-education classroom rarely ever leaves the classroom. Since the curriculum in the special classroom is geared below that of the normal class, no matter how well the child progresses each year, he inevitably falls behind his peers in their regular classroom. In addition to this problem, he also has been labeled, which provides not only a social stigma but destroys the child’s own self-image. If data were available, it is quite possible that we would discover adolescent suicides are much higher among those children who have been labeled and classified compared to those who have not.

As the school systems develop these programs, they are placing labels on the children at earlier and earlier ages. Within the next few years we will see more and more schools taking responsibility for children at ages 2 or 3. One of the initial steps the school will develop is to test and evaluate the child. The children are no longer attached with relatively harmless labels such a being lazy or full of beans or he is all boy. Now the child is learning-disabled, hyperactive, or behavioral disordered. There’s a potential for great danger in this, in that millions of children run the risk of being permanently disabled through the process of having these labels thrust upon them.

Goals of Home Programs

When we work on home programs with children with mild dysorganization on the pons, mid-brain, and cortical levels, we can often alleviate these minor problems within a six-month period. If the child has a more severe problem, therapeutical measures would take a longer amount of time for complete remediation. We set home-program goals for children with minor problems as high as advancing academically in reading and math at a rate of one year’s growth within every three-month period.

Rapid advancement is not as difficult as it may sound, because concurrently we are improving the child’s neurological functions, enabling him to absorb information and process it at a much faster rate. We also design the academic program to fit the needs of each individual child. Quite often we only require thirty minutes a day for the child’s instruction, for both the neurological and academic portions of the program.

The future can be bright for these children if the problem itself is treated and not the symptoms. We must also avoid the labels, stigma, and destruction of the child’s self-image.

Reprinted from the Journal of The NACD Foundation (formerly The National Academy for Child Development)

Journal of the National Association for Child Development 1986, Volume 7, No. 8

The post The Learning “Disabled” Child: Special Education appeared first on NACD International | The National Association for Child Development.

The final stage in developing neurological organization-neurological efficiency is the establishment of cortical hemispheric dominance. Cortical hemisphere dominance refers to the establishment of a controlling hemisphere of the brain, separation of, or specialization of neurological function. This separation of function is possible when dominance has been achieved.

Dominance, that factor which permits cortical specialization, exists at such time as when the individual has a dominant hand, eye, ear, and foot which are all on the same side. Specifically the right handed individual need also be right eyed, eared, and footed, the left handed individual left eyed, eared, and footed.

Much has been written in the last few years relative to the specific functions of the dominant and subdominant hemispheres, the dominant hemisphere being that which is on the opposite side of the dominant hand, eye, ear, and foot. The person with right sided dominance has a dominant left hemisphere, the person with left sided dominance, a dominant right hemisphere.

One very significant function, relative to learning which has not been mentioned in most of the literature, is emotionality. As is music (it is not difficult to see the correlation between music and emotionality) emotionality is a subdominant hemisphere function.

Emotionality in the neurologically organized individual is controlled, it being subdominant. One of the problems associated with neurological dysorganization is the lack of laterality-dominance, lack of separation, and specifically relative to emotionality, lack of control of emotionality. In the dysorganized individual subdominant tends to control dominant, as opposed to the appropriate dominant control or balance. This lack of control is significant for all individuals with neurological dysorganization. The dysorganized child with a “learning disability” often is excessively emotional, becomes upset easily, is difficult to calm once having become upset, and tends to become anxious-emotional in a learning situation. Functioning subdominantly-emotionally the child cannot take in, or put out information efficiently. Most everyone has experienced the frustration of being nervous about an exam and being unable to recall specific information until after the tests have been collected, and it’s too late. For the dysorganized child this problem is greatly magnified. The solution is the elimination of the neurological dysorganization, but while such dysorganization exists, we can only put information in or get it out when the child is relaxed, confident, and functioning dominantly.

Dysorganized adults often (mental institutions are full or people who can not) learn to cope, by creating conscious controls of emotionality. They develop screens between themselves and others, and often appear to be non-emotional because they have learned that they can either fight off emotion, or become virtually engulfed by their emotionality. These individuals are forced to live their lives limiting emotionality and protecting themselves.

We have learned to accept our inefficiencies, spending our lives with the pressures of attempting to cope with our problems, when solutions are available. Thousand of hours are spent in academic remediation, counseling, analyses, and thousands of dollars on medications to help us cope with neurological inefficiencies which are easily eliminated if we address and treat the cause.

An understanding of the relationship between neurological dysorganization, dominance, and emotionality can dramatically improve any aspects of our lives, as well as those of our children.

Reprinted from the Journal of The NACD Foundation (formerly The National Academy for Child Development)

Reprinted by permission of The NACD Foundation, Volume 3 No. 2, 1982 ©NACD

The post Dominance and Emotionality appeared first on NACD International | The National Association for Child Development.